Correlates epigenetic markers with survival in glioblastoma patients, suggesting implications for personalized therapy.
Objectives Glioblastoma (GB) is a heterogeneous group of tumors with poor patient’s outcome. The epigenetic markers could influence patient’s outcome and add more precision in sub-typing. Methods The study aims to determine a correlation between the methylation status of 65 genes and the overall survival (OS) in 50 GB Tunisian patients using methylation specific-multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) technique. Results OS was significantly longer for patients with tumors harboring unmethylated tumor suppressor genes ATM , BRCA1 , BRCA2 , TP53 and TP73 and the DNA repairing gene MSH6 . Furthermore, simultaneous unmethylation of ATM , BRCA2 , CD44 and VHL genes was associated with GB presenting normal EGFR status. This subgroup exhibits a better prognosis (OS=15 months, p=0.005). Our results also showed that, combined methylation of TP73 , THBS1 , GSTP1 and ESR1 genes in amplified EGFR GB subtype resulted in a poor prognosis group (OS=3 months, p=0.041). Simultaneous methylation of HLTF and SFRP5 genes was associated with wild-type IDH1 GB defining therefore a very poor prognosis group (OS=1 month, p=0.026). Besides, BRCA1 methylation in wild-type IDH1 group was significantly associated with poor prognosis (OS=6 months, p=0.002). Interestingly, RBM14 and PCCA genes were co-methylated in 80 % of prolonged survival cases (GB+). In absence of EGFR amplification and with unmethylation of BRCA1 , BRCA2 , ATM , VHL , CD44 , HLTF and SFRP5 genes, GB+ tumors seemed to respond better to treatment, avoiding the relapse and conferring prolonged survival (>36 months). Conclusion Combining genes methylation status of GB with EGFR and IDH1 profiles will refine subtyping, predict patient’s outcomes and guide personalized therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trabelsi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: