This preprint reveals convergent gravitational patterns in high-redshift galaxies and galactic kinematics, suggesting a new unified framework.
This preprint synthesizes recent observations spanning 14 orders of magnitude in spatial scale, revealing convergent patterns suggesting time-evolving gravitational phenomenology. We unify data from JWST high-redshift galaxies (z > 14), DESI DR1 expansion history, and galactic kinematics through a framework of complex vacuum field dynamics with U(1) phase structure. KEY FINDINGS: The Hubble Mountain: We identify a non-monotonic peak in H₀(z) at z ≈ 1.32 in model-independent DESI reconstructions as the signature of a discrete Phase 2 vacuum transition. The 2:1 Symmetry: A rigid theoretical consequence is a 2:1 ratio between vacuum modulus relaxation and expansion boost, matching the observed peak amplitude H₀ ≈ 71.04 ± 1.93 km/s/Mpc. Cosmic Dawn Ignition: A Phase 1 transition at z ~ 15.5 enables a 35-fold holographic enhancement of the MONDian acceleration scale a₀, naturally explaining the unexpectedly rapid formation and chemical maturity (oxygen/nitrogen) of JWST galaxies. Galactic Scaling: Systematic tests across 175 SPARC galaxies and 23 dwarf spheroidals demonstrate that horizon-dependent formulations (a₀ ∝ H(z)) provide superior fits to rotation curves over fixed-parameter models. FALSIFICATION ROADMAP: The framework presents six independent empirical pathways for verification or refutation by 2035:- Near-term (2026-2027): Gaia DR4 wide binaries, DESI DR2 mountain persistence- Medium-term (2028-2030): Roman Space Telescope lensed supernovae, JWST high-z spectroscopy- Long-term (2030-2035): CMB-S4 large-scale correlations, SKA 21cm tomography, Einstein Telescope gravitational wave sirens The framework addresses major cosmological tensions (Hubble, S₈, JWST early galaxies, SMBH growth) through a unified physical mechanism, while connecting to string theory swampland conjectures and quantum gravity consistency requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abraham J. Letter (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: