Assesses high-frequency hearing and its impact on lyric comprehension in cochlear implantees, suggesting significant auditory benefits.
Objective: The aim of this study is to assess high-frequency hearing performance in cochlear implantees and its impact on lyric comprehension in musical perception. Methods: In this study, 18 cochlear implant users were included. High-frequency hearing thresholds were measured with the implant device in on and off conditions. Patients were divided into 2 categories based on their ability to understand melody and lyrics or melody alone. Audiometric assessments included free-field audiometry, extended high-frequency audiometry, and Categories of Auditory Performance-II. Results: Hearing thresholds at high frequencies improved significantly with the CI activated ( P <0.001 across all frequencies) compared with the deactivated state. CI users who could understand both melody and lyrics showed better hearing thresholds at 9 kHz ( P =0.007) and higher CAP-II scores ( P =0.013) than CI users who could understand the melody but not the lyrics. A moderate positive correlation was observed between CAP-II scores and speech discrimination (ρ=0.629, P =0.003). Conclusions: Cochlear implants may extend auditory stimulation to frequencies beyond the typical range. Cochlear implants may extend auditory stimulation to a limited range of frequencies beyond the typical auditory spectrum. Improved high-frequency hearing, particularly at 9 kHz, is associated with better lyric comprehension in CI users, underscoring the importance of high-frequency hearing in musical perception and speech discrimination. Enhancing cochlear implants with components—such as microphones, speech processors, and transmitters—capable of capturing, analyzing, and delivering high-frequency acoustic signals may contribute to improved music perception and speech intelligibility, particularly in noisy environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karaçayli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: