Evaluation compares citation lists in information retrieval searches and a local bibliography, emphasizing criteria for assessment.
An evaluation of three computer‐oriented information retrieval searches is attempted by comparing their resultant citation lists to each other and to a locally‐prepared bibliography of the scientific and medical literature on the pupil of the eye. Needs and goals in the field of computer information services are discussed, and the importance of developing definite criteria for evaluation is stressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stark et al. (1971) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: