Key result
POCUS by family physicians underestimates AAA diameter by ~0.2 cm versus hospital validation scans.
Why the study?
Does point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by family physicians accurately measure abdominal aortic diameter compared to hospital-based imaging in men over 65 with a smoking history?
Cross-Sectional (n=18)
Single-blind
Yes
Does point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by family physicians accurately measure abdominal aortic diameter compared to hospital-based imaging in men over 65 with a smoking history?
Mean Difference: 0.2 (95% CI -1.1–0.4)
p-value: p=0.006
Family physicians with variable POCUS experience can accurately perform AAA screening in the ambulatory setting, with measurements closely correlating to hospital-based scans.
Supports ambulatory POCUS AAA screening by family physicians; leaves open larger prospective validation before routine adoption.
Objective: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) carry a mortality rate as high as 80% . Early detection through a screening ultrasound can lead to a large mortality reduction. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has preliminary data suggesting it is as accurate as hospital-based ultrasounds performed by a sonographer. This validation study investigated the relative concordance of family physicians using POCUS to determine aortic diameter compared with hospital-based ultrasound studies. Methods: The study was a cross-sectional, multi-observation study conducted at 3 office practices. Five family physicians with varying degrees of training and experience utilized various ultrasound machines to measure maximal aortic diameter at the proximal, mid, and distal aorta. Hospital-based ultrasound or Computed Tomography (CT) served as the validation scan. Pairwise comparisons were made, with statistical testing for difference using the T-TEST command with the PAIRS subcommand. Results: Forty-four independent observations were completed by the 5 physicians on the 18 patients (n = 18). The mean difference between the POCUS and validation scans was 0.2 cm (95% CI −1.10 to 0.40). The family physicians generally underestimated the aortic diameter. The proximal aorta had the largest mean difference in aortic size (0.23 cm; P = .003). Type of ultrasound device used, the width of the largest aortic segment, and low patient body mass index had significant relations. Conclusion: This small study found data suggesting that family physicians with variable POCUS experience can accurately perform AAA screening in the ambulatory setting with either handheld or cart-based POCUS machines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paulus et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (n=18). Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) vs. Hospital-based ultrasound or Computed Tomography (CT) was evaluated on Mean difference in maximal aortic diameter between POCUS and validation scans (MD 0.2 cm, 95% CI -1.10 to 0.40, p=0.006). Family physicians using point-of-care ultrasound to screen for abdominal aortic aneurysms underestimated aortic diameter by a mean difference of 0.2 cm compared to hospital-based validation scans.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: