Cross-sectional study reports social media impacts food choices in young adults, indicating potential for misinformation.
Objective The accuracy of user-generated content on social media (SM) is unclear, raising concerns about misinformation and the influence of marketing on food choices. This study aimed to determine the self-reported influence of SM use on food choices through investigating different types on nutrition information, sources of influence and platform usage.Design A cross-sectional descriptive study with an analytical component was conducted by a self-administered electronic survey (n = 1 434).Setting Tertiary institution in Western Cape, South Africa.Participants 1 434 registered undergraduate and postgraduate students aged 18–35 years, who were SM users.Results The majority (64%) used SM for health and nutrition-related content, with 89% of participants reporting it influenced their food choices. Females (70%, n = 693) were more likely than males (52%, n = 228) to use social media for nutrition information (p < 0.0001). Daily engagement was highest on Instagram (64%). Participants rated their level of influence of SM on their food choices for diets, supplements, food products and recipes; using a four-point Likert scale (no influence, slight influence, moderate influence, high influence). Participants mostly reported ‘no influence’ of diets (41%) and supplements (49%) on food choices, while a ‘slight’ level of influence was reported for food products (46%) and recipes (44%). The majority (61%) reported trying to convince others to try food products, supplements, recipes or diet trends seen on SM.Conclusion SM was used to access nutrition-related content and had a self-reported impact on food choices. Food products, recipes, and friends and family were most influential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kreft et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: