Cross-sectional study assesses urinary podocalyxin in type 2 diabetic nephropathy, indicating its potential as an early biomarker.
Purpose Podocalyxin is a urinary protein that may serve as a potential indicator for the early detection of diabetic nephropathy. The objectives of this study were to assess urinary podocalyxin levels in patients with and without type 2 diabetic nephropathy and to determine its correlation with renal function. Materials and methods This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital in south India for 18 months. Study subjects were divided into four groups: non-diabetics, diabetics without albuminuria, diabetics with microalbuminuria, and diabetics with macroalbuminuria. Urinary albumin was detected by the dipstick method in a spot urine sample for all study subjects. Urinary albumin was quantified by nephelometry. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique estimated urinary podocalyxin levels in all groups. Results Urinary podocalyxin levels were elevated in diabetic subjects compared to the control group. There was a positive correlation between urinary podocalyxin and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) in diabetic study subjects. No correlation was found between urinary podocalyxin and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Urinary podocalyxin showed a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 64% (at a cut-off value of 275.56 ng/mL) in estimating albuminuria in diabetic subjects. Urinary podocalyxin showed a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 78% (at a cut-off value of 273.38 ng/mL) in estimating eGFR in diabetic subjects. Conclusion Urinary podocalyxin levels were elevated in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy. It was positively correlated with the urine albumin-creatinine ratio in diabetic subjects. However, there was no correlation with the estimated glomerular filtration rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perumal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: