Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial demonstrates reduced reactance and aggression in adolescents, suggesting effective intervention.
Purpose Reactance peaks during adolescence, underscoring the need for targeted interventions. This study examined whether a mentalization-based group intervention (MBI-G) could reduce reactance and aggression among adolescents. Method 60 high-reactance adolescents (33 girls, aged 11–15) from junior high schools in Beijing were randomly assigned to either a six-session weekly MBI-G or a school-based psychoeducational control group. Measures of mentalization, reactance, and aggression were collected at pre-intervention, mid-intervention, and post-intervention. Results Significant Time × Group interactions emerged for mentalization ( p = .027) and reactance ( p = .003). The intervention group showed greater improvements in mentalization and more substantial decreases in reactance than the controls. Post-intervention aggression was also significantly lower in the intervention group ( p = .033). Analysis showed that increases in mentalization from baseline to mid-intervention mediated the intervention's effect on reductions in reactance from baseline to post-intervention. Discussion MBI-G appears effective in reducing adolescent reactance by enhancing mentalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: