Randomized trial evaluates efficacy and safety of YY001 in glabellar lines, indicating its potential advantage over Botox®.
Background Conventional botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) products include non-therapeutic accessory proteins vary in composition and manufacturing processes, which may contribute to differences in purity and biochemical characteristics. YY001(Retoxin) is a novel recombinant BoNT/A manufactured via E. coli expression to reduce impurities, improve purity, and minimize immunogenic risk. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of YY001, a recombinant botulinum toxin type A (Chongqing Claruvis Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chongqing, China), in the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines. Methods In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle- and active-controlled Phase III trial, 529 adults aged 18–65 with moderate to severe glabellar lines were randomized 4:2:1 to receive a single 20 U injection of YY001, Botox®(Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland, Westport, Ireland), or vehicle. The primary endpoint was composite response rate (CRR) at Week 4, defined as a ≥2-grade improvement of glabellar line severity assessed by both investigator and participant. Secondary endpoints included onset time, duration, satisfaction, and safety. Results YY001 achieved a CRR of 86.7% at Week 4, significantly outperforming Botox® (66.7%, P < 0.0001) and vehicle (1.3%, P < 0.0001). It showed faster onset, longer median duration (97 days), and high participant satisfaction. Adverse events were mild and comparable across groups. Only one case of anti-drug antibody was observed; no neutralizing antibodies were detected. A 12-week follow-up and ethnically homogenous population may limit generalizability. Conclusions YY001 demonstrated strong efficacy and a favorable safety profile than Botox®. Longer-term and multicenter studies are needed to assess durability, immunogenicity, and applicability across broader populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: