PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Clinical Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract PS1-10-27: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) results from the phase 3 MONALEESA-3 trial of postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with ribociclib (RIB) + fulvestrant (FUL): A subgroup analysis of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC)

View Full Paper
MLM. De LaurentiisIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale"JMJason MouabbiThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterSIS. ImSeoul National University Hospital

Key Points

  • Investigate the effects of ribociclib and fulvestrant on progression-free survival and overall survival in a subgroup of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma.
  • Postmenopausal patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer randomized to ribociclib plus fulvestrant or placebo plus fulvestrant.
  • Subgroup analysis performed for patients with invasive lobular carcinoma receiving treatment in first-line and second-line settings.
  • Progression-free survival and overall survival evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models.
  • Patients with invasive lobular carcinoma receiving ribociclib plus fulvestrant showed a median progression-free survival of 20.5 months compared to 9.4 months for placebo plus fulvestrant (HR: 0.56).
  • In the first-line treatment, median progression-free survival was 26.3 months with ribociclib plus fulvestrant compared to 18.1 months for placebo plus fulvestrant (HR: 0.78).
  • The overall survival was longer for the ribociclib plus fulvestrant group (median: 51.2 months) versus placebo plus fulvestrant (median: 30.8 months, HR: 0.62).

Abstract

Abstract Background: The phase 3 MONALEESA-3 trial reported a statistically significant improvement in PFS with RIB + FUL over placebo (PBO) + FUL as first-line (1L) or second-line (2L) treatment (tx) in postmenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- ABC at the primary analysis (median: 20.5 months vs 12.8 months; HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.48-0.73; P 0.001). Additionally, a statistically significant OS benefit with RIB + FUL was seen at the final protocol-specified analysis (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.57-0.92), which was maintained with extended follow up (median follow-up time: 56.3 months; HR, 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59-0.90). Patients with the ILC subtype, who account for 10-15% of all breast cancer patients, show unique clinicopathological characteristics. This exploratory analysis examined the PFS and OS in a subgroup of MONALEESA-3 patients with ILC, including those receiving tx in the 1L setting. Methods: Postmenopausal patients with HR+/HER2− ABC were randomized 2:1 to receive RIB + FUL or PBO + FUL in 1L and 2L settings. PFS and OS were evaluated by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model stratified per interactive response technology by lung/liver metastasis status and previous endocrine therapy. PFS and OS were summarized using Kaplan-Meier methods. The data cutoff for this analysis was January 11, 2023. Results: Among all MONALEESA-3 patients (N=726), 120 (16.5%) had the ILC subtype, 77 of whom were treated with RIB + FUL and 43 with PBO + FUL. Additionally, of the 354 MONALEESA-3 patients receiving 1L tx, 56 (15.8%) had the ILC subtype, with 38 treated with RIB + FUL and 18 with PBO + FUL. Patient demographics and disease characteristics were balanced between the two tx arms in this subgroup. Patients had a median age of 63 y (RIB arm: 64 y; PBO arm: 63 y); 17.5% of patients had de novo ABC (RIB arm: 18.2%; PBO arm, 16.3%), and 81.7% patients had experienced relapse 12 months after completion of (neo)adjuvant therapy (RIB arm: 80.5%; PBO arm, 83.7%); 83.3% of patients had bone metastasis (RIB arm: 81.8%; PBO arm, 86.0%), and 45.0% had visceral metastasis (RIB arm: 48.1%; PBO arm: 39.5%). The baseline characteristics were similar among those with ILC receiving 1L tx and remained balanced between the two tx arms. Patients with ILC receiving RIB + FUL showed a longer PFS (median: 20.5 months) than those receiving PBO + FUL (median: 9.4 months, HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.37-0.86). The median PFS was further prolonged in patients with ILC receiving 1L tx with RIB + FUL (median: 26.3 months) over PBO + FUL (median: 18.1 months; HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.39-1.59). Additionally, patients with ILC receiving RIB + FUL had a longer OS (median: 51.2 months) than those receiving PBO + FUL (median: 30.8 months, HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39-0.98); the median OS in patients with ILC receiving 1L tx with RIB + ET vs PBO + FUL was 59.6 months vs 40.0 months (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.25-1.19). Rates of adverse events (AEs) including neutropenia, alanine aminotransferase elevation, and aspartate aminotransferase elevation in RIB + FUL-treated patients in the ILC subgroup (and in the 1L tx ILC subgroup) were comparable to those observed in the overall MONALEESA-3 population. Conclusions: Similar to the overall MONALEESA-3 population, RIB + FUL tx demonstrated an improvement in PFS and OS over PBO + FUL in patients with ILC, including among those treated in the 1L setting. The efficacy benefit of RIB observed in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC with the ILC subtype, including those receiving 1L tx, further supports the use of RIB in this patient population. Citation Format: M. De Laurentiis, J. Mouabbi, S. Im, M. Kruse, S. Chia, S. Brucker, C. Villanueva, G. Jerusalem, M. Gao, G. Sopher, J. Wu, J. Zarate, J. Beck. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) results from the phase 3 MONALEESA-3 trial of postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with ribociclib (RIB) + fulvestrant (FUL): A subgroup analysis of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-10-27.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Laurentiis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a898ecb39a600b3ef718https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-10-27
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper