PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026People and Nature1 citationsOpen Access

Digital nature in the AI era: How human and AI ‐generated representations shape future visions of rewilding

View Full Paper
FWFlurina M. WartmannUniversity of AberdeenECEmma CaryUniversity of Aberdeen

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how visual and textual representations of rewilding influence perceptions of future natures.
  • Conducted a qualitative analysis of visual and textual materials from advocacy organization websites
  • Examined social media content from Instagram related to rewilding
  • Analyzed AI-generated representations of rewilding from chatbots
  • Focused on the framing and content of visual materials in rewilding discourses
  • Representations emphasize conventional nature aesthetics, often ignoring non-charismatic species and challenging ecosystem processes.
  • Visual materials reveal normative assumptions about the desired appearance of recovered nature.
  • Findings indicate that these representations politically shape perceptions of acceptable activities and people in rewilded landscapes.
  • The study suggests a need for more inclusive environmental imaginaries in future land management.

Abstract

Abstract Rewilding has gained significant influence in nature conservation, offering hopeful narratives that address the interconnected challenges of climate change and biodiversity loss while enabling people to reconnect with ‘wildness’ in the Anthropocene. Rewilding powerfully shapes imaginaries of possible futures and is being implemented through numerous projects across the UK. These projects fundamentally transform landscape aesthetics and determine which human and non‐human species are rendered visible, desirable and legitimate in rewilded futures. In this study, we interrogate the aesthetics of rewilding through a qualitative approach that examines visual and textual materials from advocacy organisation websites, their social media accounts on Instagram and artificial intelligence (AI)‐generated representations of rewilding produced by AI chatbots. Our analysis focuses on the framing and content of visual materials, such as what is represented and what is absent, as well as how these materials construct visions of desirable future natures. We find that representations of rewilding focus on conventional nature aesthetics, predominantly excluding aesthetically challenging ecosystem processes, non‐charismatic species and a diversity of people. We argue that visual and textual materials reveal not only how nature is represented in rewilding discourses but also embody normative assumptions about what recovered or rewilded nature should look like. These visual representations act politically by normalising the presence or absence of particular people and activities in landscapes, thereby perpetuating narrow conceptualisations of environmental futures. We discuss how our findings may inform the development of more socially just environmental imaginaries, contributing to more inclusive future land management both in policy and practice. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wartmann et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a8c7ecb39a600b3efd9ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70266
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1What’s the Look of "Negative Gender" and “Max Ethnicity” in AI-Generated Images? A Critical Visual Analysis of the Intersectional Politics of Portrayal2024 · 10 citations
  2. 2Five critical questions we should ask of rewilding projects—And that social science can help us answer2025 · 5 citations
  3. 3Biopolitical Economies and the Political Aesthetics of Climate Change2010 · 101 citations
  4. 4The Aesthetics of Unscenic Nature1998 · 42 citations
  5. 5Public visual preferences for dead wood in natural boreal forests: The effects of added information2016 · 78 citations