Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A randomized controlled trial highlights the effectiveness of a mobile game for improving self-efficacy and quality of life in children with FMF, suggesting innovative management strategies.
Objective: To determine the effect of training children with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) using a mobile game (MG) or training booklet (TB) on self-efficacy, symptom management, and quality of life (HRQoL) compared with a control group. Materials and Methods: The sample of the randomized controlled experimental study consisted of children with FMF. Children in the experimental groups received training with TB ( n = 14) or MG ( n = 14). The control group ( n = 15) received no intervention and continued their routines. The Pediatric Rating of Chronic Illness Self-Efficacy Scale (PRCISE), and Juvenile Autoinflammatory Disease Multidimensional Assessment Report (JAIMAR) were used to collect data. Data were collected in pre-test, post-test-1, and post-test-2. Results: The MG group’s PRCISE ( P < 0.001, P < 0.001), HRQoL ( P = 0.001, P = 0.001), therapeutic compliance ( P = 0.002, P = 0.004), increased and the mean pain scores ( P = 0.044, P = 0.010), the number of symptoms decreased ( P < 0.001, P < 0.001) in both measurements after the intervention. The mean PRCISE score of the TB group increased only in post-test 1 ( P = 0.008), and the mean HRQoL total score did not change significantly in either post-test measurement ( P > 0.05). The TB group’s symptom management indicators were similar at all measurements ( P > 0.05). The control group’s PRCISE and HRQoL scores and symptom management indicators were similar at the three measurement times ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: The MG increased illness self-efficacy, symptom management and HRQoL in children with FMF and its effect lasted longer than the TB. It is recommended to use and disseminate technology-based and interactive education methods such as MG in the management of chronic diseases in children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alay et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: