Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cold plasma treatment improves toxicological and microbiological safety while preserving nutrients in cow's milk, suggesting its industrial potential.
The scope of this work is to compare cow’s milk hygienization methods (pasteurization, sterilization, and cold plasma treatment) in terms of milk’s toxicological safety (using Danio rerio larvae), microbiological safety (counts of mesophilic aerobic bacteria, yeasts, and molds), nutritional properties (polyphenols, vitamins: B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B9, and B12, minerals: Ca, Zn, Se), physicochemical properties (pH, conductivity, particle size, color), colloidal stability (turbidimetric method), and chemical changes in milk samples at the molecular level (FT-IR). Pasteurization was performed at 65 °C for 30 min, sterilization at 110 °C for 30 min in an autoclave, while cold plasma treatment was carried out in a gliding arc reactor using nitrogen or air as the working gas for 5, 10, or 20 min, ensuring that the milk temperature was kept below 36 °C. The studies showed that milk preserved with plasma is toxicologically safe and microbiologically safer than fresh milk. Plasma-hygienized milk also retains a higher concentration of vitamins and minerals than temperature-hygienized milk samples and has physicochemical properties similar to those of fresh milk. The use of a gliding arc reactor for milk treatment is important for potential industrial implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grządka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: