Review examines cold plasma use for food processing, packaging, and safety in agri-food systems, suggesting implications for broader adoption.
Cold plasma has emerged from a nascent research stage to a technology of industrial-scale relevance for the agri-food sector. Conventional thermal and chemical preservation methods degrade heat-sensitive nutrients and generate persistent chemical residues, underscoring the need for safer and sustainable alternatives. Cold plasma is a non-thermal processing technology that generates ionized gases containing reactive oxygen-nitrogen species (RONS) through electrical discharge at near-ambient temperatures. Unlike previous reviews that focused on isolated applications, this review systematically examines cold plasma performance across the entire agri-food chain, spanning soil remediation, seed priming, decontamination, food processing, packaging enhancement, and waste valorization. Moreover, a preliminary comparative technoeconomic assessment of apple juice processing yields a minimum selling price of $0.69 USD/kg for cold plasma under the reference scenario. This approaches the high-temperature short-time benchmark ($0.68 USD/kg) and remains more favorable than high-pressure processing ($0.72 USD/kg) and pulsed electric fields ($0.71 USD/kg). However, residual RONS accumulation, N-nitroso compound formation in protein-rich matrices, plasma-induced allergenicity, and non-intentionally added substance migration from treated packaging represent unresolved toxicological concerns. International adoption is further constrained by the lack of a unified regulatory framework between the FDA, USDA-FSIS, and the EU Novel Food Regulation 2015/2283. Future research should prioritize mechanistic understanding of RONS-matrix interactions, standardized parameter reporting, pilot-scale validation, and harmonized safety frameworks to establish standardized treatment parameters and facilitate their wider adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patwary et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: