PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 20, 2026Scientific Reports2 citationsOpen Access

Alternative splicing and differential gene expression during changes in endometrial receptivity in patients with recurrent implantation failure

View Full Paper
MWM WangBLBing-jie LuXLXiang Lu

Key Points

  • To investigate transcriptomic changes linked to endometrial receptivity in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF).
  • Collected endometrial biopsies from 90 healthy controls and 73 RIF patients across different receptivity phases.
  • Conducted high-throughput RNA sequencing to analyze gene expression and splicing events.
  • Performed bioinformatic analyses to assess immune cell dynamics and RNA-binding protein networks.
  • Identified significant alternative splicing events and differential gene expression associated with endometrial receptivity.
  • Highlighted immune dysregulation with changes in monocytes during receptive phases.
  • Uncovered potential therapeutic targets through drug repurposing related to splicing events.

Abstract

Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) remains a major challenge in assisted reproductive technology, and the molecular mechanisms underlying endometrial receptivity are incompletely understood. This study aimed to comprehensively characterize transcriptomic alterations, including alternative splicing events (ASEs), differential gene expression (DEGs), and immune cell dynamics across different phases of endometrial receptivity in women with RIF. Endometrial biopsies were collected from 90 healthy fertile controls and 73 RIF patients during pre-receptive, receptive, and post-receptive phases. High-throughput RNA sequencing was performed, and bioinformatic analyses were conducted to identify ASEs, DEGs, immune cell composition, and RNA-binding protein (RBP) networks. Skipped exons and mutually exclusive exons were the predominant splicing events observed. Both ASEs and DEGs were significantly enriched in pathways regulating cell adhesion, cytoskeletal organization, and immune modulation. KHDRBS3 emerged as a potential key RBP involved in splicing regulation during the window of implantation. Immune profiling revealed dynamic alterations in CD8 + T cells, NK cells, and monocytes between non-receptive and receptive phases, suggesting immune dysregulation associated with implantation failure. Drug repurposing analysis identified several small molecules targeting ASE-related genes, offering promising therapeutic options for RIF. These findings highlight the coordinated changes in alternative splicing, gene expression, and immune cell composition that characterize endometrial receptivity and provide insights that may guide the development of novel diagnostic biomarkers and targeted interventions to improve reproductive outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6997b911baf9c852d8c25eb6https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40386-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multi-level profiling of the endometrial transcriptome identifies immune dysregulation in recurrent implantation failure2026
  2. 2Bioinformatics analysis for identifying hub genes in endometriosis and recurrent implantation failure: molecular pathways to enhanced IVF success2025
  3. 3The Contribution of Proteomics in Understanding Endometrial Protein Expression in Women with Recurrent Implantation Failure2024 · 23 citations
  4. 4Asynchrony Between Endometrial miRNA- and mRNA-Based Receptivity Stages Associated with Impaired Receptivity in Recurrent Implantation Failure2025
  5. 5Unraveling the H19/GAS1 axis in recurrent implantation failure: A potential biomarker for diagnosis and insight into immune microenvironment alteration2024 · 1 citations