Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study reveals prognostic biomarker associated with increased mortality risk in cardiac surgery patients.
The neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) has emerged as a potential prognostic biomarker in the context of cardiac surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the association between NPAR and all-cause mortality (ACM) among patients undergoing cardiac surgery, with the goal of identifying high-risk groups and informing prognostic assessments. Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV, version 3.1) database. Participants were categorized into tertiles based on NPAR values. The primary outcomes were 30-day ACM and 360-day ACM following cardiac surgery. Cox proportional hazards regression and restricted cubic splines (RCS) models were utilized to assess the relationship between NPAR and mortality risk. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analyses were conducted to compare survival probabilities across NPAR tertiles, and subgroup analyses were performed to examine consistency across different strata. A total of 2,101 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 70% were male. The 30-day and 360-day ACM rates were 2% and 6%, respectively. Higher NPAR levels were independently associated with increased risks of both 30-day ACM (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–6.24) and 360-day ACM (adjusted HR, 2.19; 95% CI 1.29–3.73). The RCS models demonstrated a positive, linear association between NPAR and mortality risk. K-M analyses demonstrated significantly lower survival probabilities in the highest NPAR tertile. Subgroup analyses showed no significant interaction effects. Elevated NPAR values were independently associated with increased risks of 30-day and 360-day ACM following cardiac surgery. These findings suggest that NPAR may be a valuable marker for identifying high-risk patients and improving postoperative risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: