Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis identifies sedation needs and risk factors for unsedated colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening, suggesting improved patient experience.
Colorectal cancer poses a global burden, and colonoscopy is an effective screening tool, with unsedated colonoscopy offering distinct advantages but facing completion challenges. A retrospective analysis of 745 patients who underwent unsedated colonoscopy between July 2021 and August 2022 was conducted, with participants divided into completion (n = 670) and incompletion (n = 75) groups. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in gender, age, constipation history, anxiety grade, postoperative Visual Analogue Scale scores and examiner experience between groups. Multivariate logistic regression identified constipation (odds ratio [OR] = 4.981, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.755–5.633), high anxiety (OR = 8.499, 95% CI: 4.987–10.212) and examination by a less-experienced physician (OR = 3.319, 95% CI: 2.673–4.732) as independent risk factors. The constructed nomogram model demonstrated good predictive accuracy (Hosmer–Lemeshow test: χ 2 = 4.561, p = 0.683) and discriminative ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.886, 95% CI: 0.749–0.970). This model enables clinicians to identify high-risk patients preoperatively, optimise examination plan selection (e.g. recommending sedation) or implement intensive interventions, thereby improving the completion rate of unsedated colonoscopy and enhancing patient experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: