Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework enhances digital forensics by ensuring secure authentication and protecting sensitive records during transmission.
The rapid expansion of digital forensics and cloud-based evidence management has introduced new challenges in preserving the confidentiality, integrity, and authenticity of sensitive forensic records. These challenges intensify when evidence is captured using IoT-enabled imaging devices and transmitted across untrusted networks. To address this problem, this paper presents a secure and practical forensic record management framework that integrates a Real-time Crypto Image Camera with a cloud-based Cryptoserver. The proposed system ensures end-to-end protection of forensic images by combining image-dependent chaos-based encryption, SHA-256 hashing, and AES-128 symmetric cryptography, offering strong confidentiality while remaining lightweight enough for resource-constrained edge devices such as the Raspberry Pi 4. A dynamic, image-derived key generation mechanism enhances security against dictionary, rainbow-table, and chosen-plaintext attacks, while an Abstract Data Table (ADT) with hashed credentials ensures protected authentication and controlled access. Experimental evaluation conducted on benchmark and real-time forensic images demonstrates high entropy ( \({≈ } {7.99}\) ), strong diffusion properties (NPCR > 99.6 %), and uniform pixel change rates (UACI \({≈ } {33.4 %)}\) ), confirming the superior randomness and resilience of the proposed scheme compared with recent chaos-based methods. Real-time deployment achieved an average encryption latency of 0.38 s for \({512} {× } {512}\) images on Raspberry Pi 4, validating its suitability for live forensic operations. Overall, the proposed framework provides an efficient, scalable, and privacy-preserving solution for secure forensic data acquisition, storage, and transmission, enhancing both investigative reliability and operational security.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sekar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: