Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Energy performance of solar drying systems evaluated in Peru, suggesting thermal storage enhances efficiency.
This study evaluates the energy performance of three solar drying systems operating under the climatic conditions of Chachapoyas, Peru: a natural convection dryer (D0), a dryer with non-continuous forced-air extraction (D1), and a forced-air dryer incorporating thermal energy storage using river sand in the collector (D2). The systems were operated simultaneously under identical environmental conditions. The experimental evaluation was conducted over a 30-day period between July and September 2025, with monitoring from 06:35 to 18:17 h at 5-minute intervals. Solar radiation, ambient conditions, and temperature profiles were recorded using an Arduino-based data acquisition system. Available solar energy ranged from 1589.56 to 6047.25 Wh·m⁻². The system with thermal storage (D2) achieved the highest mean thermal efficiency (46.04 ± 11.66%), followed by D0 (45.82 ± 10.45%), while D1 showed the lowest efficiency (39.67 ± 10.08%). Thermal storage improved energy stability and reduced sensitivity to solar variability conditions overall.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gurbillón et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: