Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study evaluates diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided omental biopsy in patients, suggesting its efficacy and safety.
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided omental biopsy in patients with omental involvement, and to assess the added value of pre-biopsy computed tomography (CT). This retrospective study included 75 patients who underwent US-guided omental biopsy between January 2023 and 2025. Demographics, clinical, surgical pathology, and cytology data of patients were reviewed. The Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson χ 2 test were used to compare the benign and malignant groups as well as diagnostic and non-diagnostic groups. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated using final diagnoses. Among the 75 patients [median age: 69 y (range: 28 to 87); 81% women], 70 had malignant and 5 had benign final diagnoses. US-guided omental biopsy achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 90.67%, with a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 100%, NPV of 41.67%, PPV of 100%. No complications occurred. Ascitic fluid cytology was concordant with the final diagnosis in 70% of cases. On CT, higher omental attenuation was significantly associated with diagnostic biopsies, whereas other CT features showed no significant correlation. US-guided omental biopsy is a safe, minimally invasive, and highly accurate technique for evaluating omental involvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asfuroğlu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: