PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 20, 2026Clinical and Experimental Dental Research2 citationsOpen Access

Detection and Classification of Peri‐Implant Marginal Bone Loss in Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography Using a Deep Learning Approach

View Full Paper
ZMZahra Hamidi MadaniBHBashizadeh Fakhar H.

Key Points

  • This study aimed to evaluate a deep learning model for the automated detection and classification of peri-implant marginal bone loss on 2D CBCT images.
  • Used 699 2D CBCT sections for analysis.
  • Graded marginal bone loss into four classes based on percentage of implant length.
  • Trained a YOLOv8 detector on 600x600-pixel images for 200 epochs with an 80/10/10 train/test/validation split.
  • Assessed performance using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics.
  • The YOLOv8 model achieved an overall accuracy of 0.90 on the test set.
  • Best performance was observed for healthy sites with a precision of 0.92 and recall of 0.99.
  • Moderate and severe cases showed lower F1-scores of 0.62 and 0.70 respectively.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives Modern dental implants have high long‐term survival, but peri‐implant marginal bone loss remains a multifactorial cause of implant failure and often is radiographically occult. Cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides superior 3D assessment but produces large datasets requiring expert interpretation. Deep‐learning object‐detection models like YOLOv8 may automate detection and grading. This study aimed to evaluate a YOLOv8‐based model for automated detection and grading of peri‐implant marginal bone loss on 2D images derived from CBCT. Materials and Methods This retrospective study used 699 2D CBCT sections. Marginal bone loss was graded into four classes (≤ 20%, 21%–40%, 41%–60%, > 61% of implant length). A YOLOv8 detector was trained on 600 × 600‐pixel images (bounding box width 20 px) with two classes (implant, bone loss), split 80/10/10 (train/test/val), 200 epochs, batch size 8 and tuned hyperparameters. Performance was assessed by accuracy, precision, recall, and F1‐score. Results The YOLOv8 model achieved strong diagnostic performance on the test set, with overall accuracy, precision, recall, and F1‐score of 0.90. It performed best for healthy sites (precision 0.92, recall 0.99, F1 0.95) and maintained high performance for mild lesions (F1 0.90), while moderate and severe cases showed reduced metrics (F1 0.62 and 0.70, respectively). A three‐class scheme had 0.88 accuracy and excellent reliability (Kappa = 0.954). Detection metric included mAP@0.5 (mean precision at intersection over union threshold of 0.5) of 0.889, a recall of 0.98 at low threshold, and implant‐length detection accuracy of 1.00. Training stabilized after about 15 epochs. Conclusions The YOLOv8‐based deep learning model can reliably detect and grade peri‐implant marginal bone loss on CBCT images. Future research should expand datasets, incorporate multimodal information, and validate performance across diverse clinical settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Madani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6997f9b8ad1d9b11b3452683https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70308
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper