Western Australia has shunned two important environmental legal concepts that have gained currency on the east coast and could be important for responding to climate change: a ‘global carbon budget’ analysis in environmental impact assessment of fossil fuel projects, and water access entitlements as perpetual shares in a consumptive pool of a water resource defined in accordance with a statutory water plan. The Minister for Environment (WA) implicitly rejected the global carbon budget analysis when determining appeals against the assessment report of the North West Shelf Project Extension in November 2024. The Minister for Water (WA) implicitly rejected the share entitlement concept when announcing in December 2023 that reform of our antiquated water resources law was not necessary. The political reasoning for rejecting these two concepts was legally fallacious. There is still the opportunity to adopt these concepts to mitigate and adapt to climate change.
Alex; id_orcid 0000-0002-0496-8794 Gardner (Wed,) studied this question.