Qualitative study explores well-being of survivor leaders in anti-trafficking efforts, indicating the need for ethical practices.
People with lived experience of trafficking are increasingly called upon to do anti-trafficking work, yet little research has explored how this work affects their well-being. This qualitative study draws on semi-structured interviews with nine survivor leaders, using a tool co-developed by a research team that included individuals both with and without lived experience. Through thematic analysis, the study identified both benefits and harms associated with survivor leaders’ involvement in anti-trafficking work. Survivor leaders described harmful experiences including lack of inclusivity, re-exploitation, devaluing interactions, vicarious trauma, and poor pay. They also identified positive influences such as payment, organizational policies, and interpersonal interactions. This study provides the anti-trafficking sector a better understanding about how various policies, structures, and interpersonal interactions impact survivor leader well-being and provides recommendations on how to ethically collaborate with survivor leaders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robitz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: