Comparative analysis of breast cancer cells reveals 3D models' roles in metabolism and metastasis, indicating potential for therapeutic insights.
Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture systems have emerged as powerful tools for modeling tumor biology in ex vivo settings. However, the diverse array of available 3D culture methods presents challenges in selecting the most appropriate model for specific research questions. This study provides a comparative analysis of breast cancer (BC) cells (SUM149, IBC-3, and MDA-MB-468) in the mammosphere culture (SphC) model or an “emboli” culture (EmC) model, which enrich for cancer stem cells and epithelial features, respectively. The EmC model, designed originally for inflammatory BC, is characterized by media viscosity and mechanical rocking of the culture vessel. Notably, cells in EmC showed a distinct and durable reduction in cell proliferation ex vivo while demonstrating high capacity to establish experimental lung metastases in vivo. Ultrastructural quantitative analysis of electron microscopy images suggested that cells in EmC acquire nuclear and mitochondrial features that resemble those of tumor tissue. Proteomics, single-cell transcriptomics, and metabolic flux analyses showed that cells in EmC and SphC favor mitochondrial oxidative metabolism (OXPHOS) and glycolysis, respectively. EmC rendered cells hypersensitive to OXPHOS inhibition, but more resistant to oxidative stress. Several genes associated with lung metastasis, including ID1, were specifically enriched in EmC. Given the emerging role of OXPHOS in BC cell survival during dissemination and as established metastases, we propose that the EmC paradigm is a suitable ex vivo model to study signaling pathways relevant for basal epithelial BC including lung metastases and to assess drug sensitivities and resistance mechanisms of such breast cancer cells ex vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balamurugan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: