Key result
Coral reef aorta linked to ~217% higher MACE risk following EVT for calcified AIOD.
Why the study?
The safety, technical success, and long-term outcomes of endovascular therapy in severely calcified aortoiliac occlusive disease, particularly regarding lesion characteristics and coral reef aorta, required evaluation.
Does endovascular therapy (EVT) improve long-term outcomes and technical success in patients with severely calcified aortoiliac occlusive disease?
Does endovascular therapy (EVT) improve long-term outcomes and technical success in patients with severely calcified aortoiliac occlusive disease?
In patients undergoing endovascular therapy for severely calcified aortoiliac occlusive disease, the presence of coral reef aorta and non-bifurcation lesions are significant predictors of reduced long-term freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events.
Coral reef aorta signals caution for long-term MACE risk with EVT in calcified AIOD; leaves open optimal lesion-specific strategies.
Summary: Background: To evaluate safety, technical success, and long-term outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) in severely calcified aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD), focusing on lesion characteristics and the presence of coral reef aorta (CRA). Patients and methods: This single-center retrospective study included 216 patients with angiographically confirmed calcified abdominal aortic stenosis (mean PACSS 3.7 ± 0.8) treated with EVT between 2005 and 2023. Of these, 33 patients had coral reef aorta (CRA). Patients were stratified by lesion location and CRA presence. Primary endpoints were 30-day adverse events and technical success (residual stenosis <30%). Secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major adverse limb events (MALE), and all-cause mortality. Cox regression identified predictors of outcome. Results: Technical success was achieved in 81.9%. Thirty-day mortality was 0.5%. At 10 years, freedom from MACE was significantly lower in patients with non-bifurcation abdominal aortic stenosis (56% vs. 76%; aHR 2.13, p < .05) and lowest in CRA (30% vs. 71%; aHR 3.17, p < .05). Independent predictors of MACE were CRA, chronic total occlusion (aHR 3.38, 95% CI 1.57–7.29), critical limb-threatening ischemia (aHR 3.67, 95% CI 1.74–7.75), and age (aHR 1.06 per year, 95% CI 1.01–1.11). MALE was more frequent in patients with peripheral arterial disease (aHR 2.07, 95% CI 1.12–3.81), CRA (aHR 2.51, 95% CI 1.17–5.40), and current smokers (aHR 5.10, 95% CI 1.23–21.0). Conclusions: CRA and non-bifurcation abdominal aortic stenosis are associated with reduced long-term freedom from MACE after EVT. These findings define high-risk subgroups within calcified AIOD and highlight the prognostic value of anatomical lesion characteristics for treatment planning and follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salm et al. (2026) studied this question. Endovascular therapy for calcified AIOD had 81.9% technical success and 10-year freedom from MACE was 30% with coral reef aorta versus 71% without (aHR 3.17, p < .05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: