Governance paradigms and public sector innovation: A comparative study

Much has been written about governance as well as public sector innovation, yet there remains a lack of research on how governance paradigms shape public sector innovation outcomes. Extant research, often within a single national context, has focused on innovation processes, strategies, organizational capacity and leadership, with some research suggesting that superior governance paradigms such as new public governance are better at facilitating the emergence of public sector innovation outcomes. We move beyond this literature by comparatively exploring how governance paradigms as institutional logics for public sector reforms shape public sector innovation. First, we review governance paradigms of traditional public administration, new public management, neo Weberian state and new public governance in relation to innovation outcomes. Second, we analyse 108 applications for the United Nations Public Service Awards Scheme from Italy, Japan and Turkey between 2009 and 2017. The contribution of the study is that research shows that no single governance paradigm is superior for public sector innovation outcomes, rather governance paradigms co-exist as institutional logics, layering and shaping innovations outcomes according to a country's public sector reform agenda. Points for practitioners • Governance paradigms shape which innovation outcomes public services prioritize. • Governance paradigms are much broader than merely serving as strategies to facilitate innovation, rather serving as a context for public sector innovation outcomes. • Governance paradigms act as legacies and norms with layering rather than there being a superior paradigm to support innovation. • Public sector innovation outcomes are utilized pragmatically to accomplish reform agendas.