Evaluates degradation models' impact on battery energy storage system valuation in electricity markets, suggesting significant effects.
Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) can benefit from price volatility in electricity markets, but frequent cycling increases degradation and reduces long-term value. This study develops a rolling-horizon dispatch framework in which battery operation is fully price-driven, while degradation is evaluated separately to isolate the effect of degradation model choice. A 48 h look-ahead window is solved repeatedly and advanced by 24 h, with only the first 24 h of decisions implemented and remaining capacity carried forward. Degradation is assessed using three widely used model classes: Linear-Calendar (LC), Energy-Throughput (ET), and Cycle-Based rainflow (CB) models. The framework is applied to Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) 15 min real-time prices for 2024 (Houston Zone). LC and ET result in limited annual capacity loss (≈2%) and modest economic impact, while the CB model predicts substantially higher degradation and large negative valuation. Sensitivity analysis shows that CB-based results are highly dependent on parameter calibration. Overall, the results highlight the strong influence of degradation modeling choices on BESS valuation under rolling-horizon operation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Humiston et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: