The objective of this study is to describe outcomes of rapid exome (rES) and rapid genome sequencing (rGS) in an inpatient setting. This is a retrospective cohort of inpatients with rES or rGS during their hospitalization between April 2016 and November 2023. Medical records were reviewed to measure primary outcomes: diagnostic yield, medical management changes, and anticipatory guidance updates. Descriptive analysis and formal comparisons (Welch's t ‐test with post hoc power analysis, Fischer's exact test) were performed, with rES and rGS comparisons limited to 2023 due to test distribution. Of 95 patients, most (74.7% [71/95]) were < 12 months old and admitted in neonatal (44.2% [42/95]) or pediatric (29.5% [28/95]) intensive care units. Common indications for rapid sequencing included multiple congenital anomalies (24.2% [23/95]), neurological concerns (23.3% [22/95]), and acute illness (16.8% [16/95]). Mean turnaround time of testing significantly shortened for rES from 2021 (13.2 [SD = 5.9] days) to 2023 (8.1 [SD = 4.1] days) ( p ‐value = 0.018; power = 0.74). Diagnostic yield was 29.5% (28/95) and did not significantly differ between rES (13.6% [3/22]) and rGS (35.0% [7/20]) ( p ‐value = 0.15). Sequencing led to medical management changes (86.0% [74/86]) and anticipatory guidance updates (41.4% [39/95]) with similar rates observed in diagnostic and non‐diagnostic tests. Our findings suggest rES or rGS implementation may influence diagnosis and care strategies in critically ill patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kessler et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: