Key result
H2H asthma navigators aim to reduce 12-month readmissions vs usual care in hospitalized children.
Why the study?
Asthma hospitalization is a key risk factor for future readmissions with disparate morbidity in Black children and those in poverty, making post-discharge care transitions a critical target for intervention.
Does a 12-month asthma navigator-led care coordination intervention reduce asthma readmissions in children hospitalized for asthma exacerbations?
Does a 12-month asthma navigator-led care coordination intervention reduce asthma readmissions in children hospitalized for asthma exacerbations?
This study protocol outlines a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether a 12-month asthma navigator-led care coordination intervention reduces asthma readmissions in hospitalized children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Will test navigator-led coordination for pediatric asthma; leaves open impact on 12-month readmissions and caregiver outcomes.
Introduction Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood with morbidity disproportionately affecting children across different racial and/or ethnic groups and socioeconomic statuses, specifically Black children and those living in poverty. Hospitalization for asthma is a significant risk factor for future readmissions. The Hospital‐to‐Home (H2H) study seeks to improve asthma care and outcomes by focusing on the transition home after hospitalizations. Methods The H2H study is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial comparing the H2H intervention to usual care. The intervention involves 12 months of care coordination from an asthma navigator. Participants are enrolled during hospitalization from either a freestanding urban children's hospital or an affiliated community hospital. The primary outcome is readmission for asthma within 12 months of index asthma‐related hospital admission. Secondary outcomes include caregiver asthma‐related quality of life, self‐efficacy for asthma management, perceived stress, and resilience. Discussion Children admitted with asthma exacerbations represent an at‐risk population, thus hospitalization offers a critical opportunity to deliver timely, meaningful interventions that can support sustained improvements in their care and improve long‐term outcomes. Despite the majority of asthma hospitalizations occurring in community hospitals, past studies have focused on freestanding children's hospitals. To improve the generalizability of our findings, we also enroll children from a community hospital. Optimizing care with the H2H intervention offers an opportunity to reduce asthma morbidity in an at‐risk pediatric cohort by leveraging high‐touch, cost‐effective asthma navigators for intensive coordination while maintaining low‐touch provider oversight to ensure safety and sustainability.
Law et al. (2026) studied this question. The H2H intervention using asthma navigators aims to reduce 12-month asthma readmissions and improve caregiver quality of life compared to usual care in hospitalized children.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: