Reveals gaps in institutional support for students using generative AI tools in higher education, suggesting a need for improvement.
Introduction: This study examines how widely students are using generative AI tools in higher education and whether they feel prepared and supported by their institutions in doing so. Methods: This study used descriptive analysis of survey responses from 3,839 students across 16 countries to examine AI use, preparedness, and institutional support. Results: Most students (86%) reported using AI, yet few felt prepared (23%) and many cited inadequate institutional guidance. Discussion: Findings reveal a clear gap between students’ rapid adoption of AI tools and limited institutional readiness to support them. Limitations: The study relies on voluntary, self-reported, cross-sectional data that may involve selection bias and cannot establish causality. Conclusions: Results highlight the need for stronger AI literacy, updated assessments, and clearer institutional guidance for responsible AI use in higher education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew Metzgar (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: