Exploring the Validity of the Velocity Matters Linear Position Transducer in the Back Squat and Bench Press

The purpose of the present study was to validate a new linear encoder by comparing the mean velocity (MV) and peak velocity (PV) of two linear position transducers during free-weight back squat (SQ) and bench press (BP) exercises. Barbell velocity was simultaneously recorded using GymAware (version 5.1.0; reference standard) and Velocity Matters. Fifteen male participants completed two testing sessions, each involving six repetitions (two sets of three) across five velocity ranges: >1.00 to 0.51 m·s−1 (velocity range 1: >1.00 m·s−1; velocity range 2: 0.87–0.99 m·s−1; velocity range 3: 0.75–0.86 m·s−1; velocity range 4: 0.63–0.74 m·s−1; velocity range 5: 0.51–0.62 m·s−1) in SQ and >1.02 to 0.40 m·s−1 (velocity range 1: >1.02 m·s−1; velocity range 2: 0.86–1.01 m·s−1; velocity range 3: 0.70–0.85 m·s−1; velocity range 4: 0.56–0.69 m·s−1; velocity range 5: 0.40–0.55 m·s−1) in BP. In total, 180 repetitions per velocity range were analyzed for each exercise. Validity was assessed using Pearson’s correlation (r), mean absolute error (MAE), Bland–Altman plots, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Pearson’s r indicated good (0.5–0.7) to excellent (>0.9) correlations across all ranges and exercises. However, acceptable MAE values were found only for MV in SQ (except at >1.00 m·s−1) and for both MV and PV in BP at velocities 0.70 but showed wide confidence intervals, indicating high uncertainty. CCC values were consistently poor (<0.90) across all velocity ranges and both exercises, except for PV in the lowest velocity range during BP. In conclusion, Velocity Matters may be cautiously used to monitor MV during SQ at velocities <0.87 m·s−1, but it does not provide sufficient accuracy for use in BP across any load.