CryoEM imaging reveals uncoupling mechanisms of Cl − /H + transporters in human physiology, suggesting roles of glutamic acid and polyatomic anions.
CLC Cl − channels and Cl − /H + transporters are vital for human physiology and their mutations can cause genetic disorders. In transporters, the Cl − and H + pathways intersect at a conserved glutamic acid, Egate, which serves as the Cl − gate. Egate sidechain rotates between the two pathways enabling H + movement, and its mutations abolish H + coupling. However, the structural basis of Cl − /H + coupling remains poorly understood. To address this question, we take advantage of the finding that large polyatomic anions, such as NO3 − and SCN − , impair H + coupling in transporters. CryoEM imaging of CLC-ec1, the CLC transporter from E. coli, shows that in Cl − , Egate (E148 in CLC-ec1) and conserved F357 can adopt two rotameric states in a pH-dependent manner: R1, favored at high pH, where E148 lines the Cl- pathway and F357 is “down” state that renders the pathway more hydrophobic, thus preventing H + transport, and R2 at low pH, where E148 lines the H + pathway and F357 in an “up” state which favors H + pathway hydration. In contrast, the uncoupling anions favor the H + -transport incompetent state R1 only, pH independently. MD simulations show that with Cl − at the central binding site, Scen, E148, and F357 can adopt R1 and R2, and the H + pathway is more hydrated in R2, likely facilitating H + transport. This suggests that F357 acts as a gate for the H + pathway and that its movements are energetically coupled to those of E148. In contrast, SCN- binding at Scen decouples the two gating residues, while F357 exclusively adopts a down conformation, independent of the state of E148, and H + pathway remains dehydrated. These findings explain how SCN- specifically inhibits H + movement in CLC-ec1 while leaving anion transport intact, and reveal the precise molecular steps underlying coupled exchange in CLCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: