Abstract A growing acceptance that many nonhuman animal communities have distinct cultures – group-variable patterns of behavior and information sustained over time by social learning – is beginning to reshape thinking about animal conservation. Culture, in this sense, can significantly influence how different populations interact with their environment and respond to environmental changes, and, therefore, has important implications for conservation. The literature on animal culture and conservation has led to valuable insights about how to protect endangered cultural animals. It has also led to some challenging questions. Should protecting animal cultural diversity become a new conservation goal, along the lines of preserving biodiversity? Should culture be an important consideration in prioritizing populations for conservation? Should we be designating animal “cultural heritage sites” for special protection, analogous to heritage sites of special significance for humans? This paper explores these questions and various arguments for preserving animal culture that have been offered in the literature. These include both instrumental arguments and arguments that suggest that animal cultures are of intrinsic value in their own right. These arguments raise important considerations, but they do not address all the ways in which animal cultures matter. We argue for more sustained attention to animals’ own interests in culture: animal cultures matter first and foremost because they matter to the animals themselves. Animals’ interests with respect to culture are not only about preserving practices or geographical locations, but include more abstract interests in protecting opportunities for agency, self-determination, and changing cultural traditions.
Fitzpatrick et al. (Thu,) studied this question.