Demonstrates an automated framework assessing video quality in medical science, indicating its reliability for public health education.
Unverified information in online medical science popularization videos poses significant public health risks. In the era of user-generated content, the sheer volume of daily video uploads overwhelms conventional human moderation, necessitating scalable automated assessment technologies. This study aims to develop and validate a deterministic large language model (LLM) framework for automated assessment of online medical science popularization videos. A dataset of 121 Chinese dietary weight loss videos was curated from TikTok, Bilibili, and Kwai. Audio tracks were transcribed using OpenAI’s Whisper-1 toolkit, excluding videos with excessive background noise or no spoken content. Videos were annotated by physicians using mDISCERN, a validated tool assessing clarity, reliability, fairness, references, and rigor. Thirteen LLMs—spanning general-purpose, medically tuned, and Chinese-optimized architectures—were evaluated via a novel likelihood selection strategy. This approach converted mDISCERN scoring into binary classification tasks, calculating answer likelihoods in a single forward pass to ensure deterministic outputs. Performance was measured using accuracy, F1 score, and Matthews correlation coefficient, with statistical significance assessed via paired Chi-square tests. Llama3-based models (Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct and Llama3-8B-Chinese-Chat) achieved the highest macro-average accuracy (79.50%), closely matching expert ratings in clarity (95.87%), references (97.52%), and rigor (99.17%). However, fairness assessment revealed systemic limitations, with 12/13 models scoring 19.83% accuracy, except Deepseek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B (70.25%). Our study validates the potential of LLM-driven quality assessment for weight loss videos. Performance comparison emphasizes architecture over scale or medical specialization for reliable assessments. By open-sourcing the pipeline, we provide a foundational framework that holds promise for broader application in medical science popularization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: