PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development0 citationsOpen Access

Association between RIASEC Personality Types and Intended Academic Majors among High School Students

ZIZayd Alaa Ismail

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the connection between RIASEC personality types and academic major choices among high school students.
  • Collected data from 100 Grade 10 male students using a standardized RIASEC personality inventory.
  • Classified intended academic majors into categories: STEM, business, social sciences, humanities, arts, and health sciences.
  • Analyzed data using descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, and chi-square tests for relationships.
  • Investigative and Social personality types were most common in the sample.
  • Descriptive patterns showed Investigative traits aligned with Humanities and STEM majors.
  • No significant chi-square results indicated weak relationship between personality types and intended majors.

Abstract

HRMARS - This study investigates the association between RIASEC personality types and intended academic majors among high school students, addressing the limited studies on personality–major congruence during adolescence. Data were collected using a quantitative design from 100 Grade 10 male students attending an international secondary school in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Respondents completed an RIASEC standardized personality inventory that detailed their intended academic major, and these were divided into STEM, business, social sciences, humanities, arts, and health sciences. We used descriptive statistics to assess the frequency of dominant RIASEC personality types, and employed cross-tabulations and chi-square test of independence to examine the correlation between RIASEC personality type and intended academic major. Investigative and Social personality types appeared in the sample the most among individuals. Descriptive patterns indicated that there was an alignment between Investigative traits with academic fields, especially Humanities and STEM-oriented majors, and about social traits with Health Sciences. But the chi-square analysis showed no significant relationship between the dominant RIASEC personality type and planned course of study. These results imply that personality characteristics alone may not be sufficient to predict academic intentions during early adolescence. The findings emphasise how personality-based assessments should be combined with contextual and developmental factors in guidance practice and suggest that longitudinal and culturally diverse samples should be used for future study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zayd Alaa Ismail (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994ba9873532290d01fc41https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v15-i1/27621
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Examining the influence of the RIASEC theory within the Holland code on students’ academic performance in their chosen disciplines among the context of higher education2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2University Majors and Personality Traits: A Quantitative Study of Natural Sciences and Language Majors2024
  3. 3Gender-stereotyped self-descriptions and academic major choices when patriarchy is loosening its grip2026
  4. 4Personality, Interest and Career Decisions: Assessing Psychological Readiness for Professional Choice Among High School Students2026
  5. 5Aversive Personality and RIASEC Dimensions: Findings Across Self-Reports, Registered Jobs, and Three Countries2026