What question did this study set out to answer?

To emphasize the significance of maintaining an anonymized review system in manuscript evaluation to ensure unbiased assessments.

Anonymized Review Process: Let it Remain Unviolated

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

The paper discusses the importance of unbiased manuscript evaluation in academia, highlighting ethical challenges faced by editors.

To emphasize the significance of maintaining an anonymized review system in manuscript evaluation to ensure unbiased assessments.
Descriptive analysis of the manuscript review process.
Evaluation of ethical dilemmas faced by editors during peer review.
Discussion of the impact of personal communication from authors on the review process.
Anonymized review processes are essential for unbiased evaluations.
Editors often face conflicts between ethical responsibilities and personal relationships.
Maintaining the sanctity of the review system is crucial for the credibility of published work.

Kirtisudha Mishra (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark