PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Acta Psychologica0 citationsOpen Access

Employee voice with purpose: Linking psychological safety, obligation and efficacy

View Full Paper
ACAbhijeet Singh ChauhanRBRicha BanerjeeSBSubeer Banerjee

Key Points

  • This research examines how psychological safety, felt obligation for constructive change, and voice efficacy influence employee voice intentions.
  • Quantitative cross-sectional research design
  • Data collected from over 300 faculty members in Indian higher education institutions
  • Used structured surveys with validated scales for FOCC, PS, VE, and voice types
  • Analyzed data using PLS SEM to assess relationships
  • Felt obligation for constructive change positively relates to promotive voice and negatively to prohibitive voice.
  • Psychological safety is positively associated with prohibitive voice.
  • Voice efficacy shows a positive relation with prohibitive voice and a negative relation with promotive voice.
  • Voice efficacy mediates the relationships between FOCC, PS, and both promotive and prohibitive voice.

Abstract

Employee voice is essential for organizational learning and adaptability. In a rapidly changing organizational environment, it is vital to encourage employees to voice concerns, make suggestions, and offer ideas in order to foster innovation, flexibility, and success. Drawing on theory of planned behavior, this research seeks clarify how felt obligation for constructive change (FOCC), Psychological safety (PS), and Voice efficacy (VE) shape employee voice intentions. The research employed quantitative cross-sectional research design. The data was collected using structured survey of more than 300 faculty members from Indian HEIs with the help of validated scales of the variables FOCC, PS, VE, Promotive and Prohibitive voice. PLS SEM was used to assess direct and mediated relationships. The results indicate that FOCC is positively related to promotive voice and negatively related to prohibitive voice. Psychological safety is positively related to prohibitive voice, while voice efficacy shows a positive relation with prohibitive voice and a negative relation with promotive voice. VE mediates relationships between FOCC, PS and promotive/prohibitive voice. The research hints at certain boundary conditions under which the relationships exist between determinants, promotive voice and prohibitive voice in Indian HEIs. The findings help in improving theoretical understanding of the antecedents of voice by linking it to moral norms, attitudes and perceived behavioral control in motivating voice expression.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chauhan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994bdd873532290d01fdc8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106472
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper