This work reveals improved rainfall threshold estimation methods for landslide prediction in data-limited areas, indicating broad application potential.
This work contributes a new framework for establishing data-driven rainfall thresholds in high-risk, data-limited contexts. Rainfall thresholds are commonly used to characterise the precipitation needed to trigger landslides in a region. However, these empirical relationships are sensitive to the exact definition of a “rainfall event”, especially how the minimum inter-event time (MIT) and triggering event (TE) are defined. Using Bayesian inference (BI) and nonlinear least-squares (NLS) techniques, this study evaluates how variations in MIT and TE definitions affect rainfall threshold estimation, considering both Event Rainfall–Duration ( E-D ) and Intensity–Duration ( I-D ) spaces. The dataset includes 15-min rainfall measurements from 52 gauges recorded from 2005 to 2023, as well as a regional landslide dataset compiled from British Geological Survey records covering the South Wales coalfields. Findings reveal that BI -derived thresholds are more stable than NLS -based thresholds, showing smaller parameter changes and fewer unrealistic curves, particularly in I–D space, where NLS often produces near-flat thresholds. Overall, both BI and NLS approaches demonstrate their strongest performance at MIT = 48 h, emphasising the role of extended antecedent rainfall in triggering spoil tip failures. This study demonstrates how the integration of robust Bayesian methods facilitates the downscaling of global thresholds to data-scarce regions and how careful event delineation practices can improve landslide prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abeysiriwardana et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: