PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Arthritis Research & Therapy2 citationsOpen Access

Prevalence and clinical relevance of systematically tested antimitochondrial antibodies in systemic sclerosis

ATAntonio TonuttiFMFrancesca MottaNINatasa Isailovic

Key Points

  • This study investigates the prevalence and clinical relevance of antimitochondrial antibodies in systemic sclerosis patients.
  • Conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study on systemic sclerosis patients at a referral center.
  • Tested serum for antimitochondrial antibodies using HEp-2 immunofluorescent screening and ELISA.
  • Compared patient features between AMA-positive and AMA-negative cases.
  • Out of 165 systemic sclerosis patients, 37 (22%) tested positive for antimitochondrial antibodies.
  • AMA were significantly associated with gastrointestinal vascular involvement (OR 13.3).
  • Association with gastric antral vascular ectasia was also noted (OR 7.99).
  • AMA presence did not show significant links to other disease features like cutaneous or pulmonary involvement.

Abstract

Antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA), the hallmark of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), have been inconsistently reported and poorly characterized in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Although recently linked to subclinical dysmotility in a cohort enriched for gastrointestinal (GI) involvement, data on the prevalence and clinical relevance of AMA in real-life SSc cohorts remain limited. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on consecutive SSc patients followed at a referral center for the disease. Patients were tested for serum AMA according to reference standards, including HEp-2 immunofluorescent screening and ELISA confirmation (anti-E2 pyruvate dehydrogenase). Patients’ features were compared between AMA-positive and -negative cases. Among 165 SSc patients (20% diffuse cutaneous disease, 33% interstitial lung disease, 7.3% pulmonary arterial hypertension; 51% positive for anticentromere antibodies, 29% anti-topoisomerase I, 12% anti-RNA polymerase III), 37 (22%) were AMA-positive. While strongly associated with PBC, AMA were not linked to significant differences in cutaneous, vascular, pulmonary, or myocardial involvement. However, AMA were associated with GI vascular involvement (OR 13.3, 95% CI 2.53–95.0; p = 0.002), including gastric antral vascular ectasia (OR 7.99, 95% CI 1.05–72.5; p = 0.045), independently from PBC or symptoms of SSc-GI involvement. These complications are clinically relevant, as they may lead to GI bleeding and refractory iron-deficiency anemia. In our cohort of SSc patients systematically screened for autoantibodies, we found a high prevalence of AMA and identified a novel putative association with GI vascular involvement, which warrants confirmation in independent studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tonutti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994c01873532290d02023chttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-026-03771-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper