Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates a link between gut microbiome and cancer risk in individuals with obesity, suggesting potential interventions.
Background The mechanisms underlying obesity-related cancer risk are incompletely understood. We investigated whether the gut microbiome causally mediates this relationship. Methods We performed two-sample Mendelian randomisation, with mediation analysis, to assess causal links between genetically predicted body mass index (BMI)/waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for BMI (WHRadjBMI), 211 gut microbial taxa, and eight cancers (384,738 cases) of European ancestry. Significant associations were replicated in the FinnGen cohort. Results Genetically predicted BMI was associated with risk of colorectal (CRC; odds ratio per standard deviation (OR SD ): 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI): [1.06–1.17]; P = 4.95 × 10 −6 ), kidney (RCC) (OR SD : 1.48; 95% CI: [1.34–1.63]; P = 1.61 × 10 −15 ), endometrial (OR SD : 1.70; 95% CI: [1.55–1.87]; P = 2.09 × 10 −27 ), lung (OR SD : 1.20; 95% CI: [1.12–1.29]; P = 1.40 × 10 −7 ), and oesophageal cancer (OR SD : 1.25; 95% CI: [1.13–1.39]; P = 3.09 × 10 −5 ). Seven microbial taxa were associated with CRC risk. Phylum and class Actinobacteria showed the strongest effects (OR SD : 1.48; 95% CI: [1.29–1.70]; P = 1.78 × 10 −8 ) and (OR SD : 1.36; 95% CI: [1.22–1.51]; P = 2.57 × 10 −8 ), respectively, and replicated in FinnGen, mediating 29% (95% CI: [8-50]) and 21% (95% CI: [4–37]) of the BMI to CRC risk—collectively accounting for 50% of the relationship. No consistent microbiome mediation was observed for other cancers. Conclusions Gut Actinobacteria may contribute to obesity-driven CRC risk, supporting the rationale of microbiome-targeted interventions to reduce CRC risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yates et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: