Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals vacancies on the Board of Governors do not significantly affect monetary policy outcomes.
I provide evidence that decreased efficiency in the appointment process to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve has resulted in an increase in the number of average vacancies. I then estimate whether this increase in vacancies is costly for the economy. I find little evidence to suggest that this is the case: monetary policy, uncertainty about the future path of interest rates, and the Board of Governor's ability to supervise and communicate have been largely unaffected by the number of absences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cody Couture (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: