Investigation reveals critical interface roles in thermal runaway of all-solid-state batteries, suggesting new safety designs.
Sulfide all solid-state batteries represent a promising next generation energy storage technology. However, their presumed safety is challenged by the risk of thermal runaway initiating at unexpectedly low temperatures. This critical issue stems from the unstable chemical interface between the positive electrode and thiophosphate solid electrolyte, a factor often overlooked in favor of electrochemical studies. Here we demonstrate that this electrochemically formed interphase is the primary trigger for catastrophic failure, not the bulk materials. Our investigation reveals a universal two stage degradation mechanism. The first stage involves intense exothermic reactions at the interface below 160 °C, releasing heat and gases. This initiates a second stage of propagating reactions leading to thermal runaway. Crucially, we show this hazardous process can be suppressed by interface engineering. We design a stable interfacial layer using a germanium sulfur chemistry, specifically lithium germanium sulfide. This modification delivers improved thermal safety without sacrificing battery performance. Our findings have the potential to establish a forward-looking safety paradigm, shifting the focus from bulk material compatibility to interfacial stability, and provide a vital design principle for future safe solid-state batteries. Sulfide all-solid-state batteries face thermal safety challenges. Here, authors identify the critical role of positive electrode-electrolyte interface reactions in driving thermal runaway and demonstrate that stabilizing this interface significantly enhances thermal stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: