Key result
AV-optimised conduction system pacing increased left ventricular stroke volume by 11.8%, with echocardiographic markers predicting response better than ECG parameters.
Why the study?
AV-optimised conduction system pacing improves haemodynamics and symptoms in symptomatic first-degree AV block, but selection criteria remain uncertain.
Do baseline echocardiographic and electrocardiographic parameters predict acute stroke volume improvement with AV-optimised conduction system pacing in patients with symptomatic first-degree AV block?
Do baseline echocardiographic and electrocardiographic parameters predict acute stroke volume improvement with AV-optimised conduction system pacing in patients with symptomatic first-degree AV block?
Echocardiographic markers of mechanical AV dyssynchrony, rather than ECG parameters like PR interval, predict acute haemodynamic improvement from AV-optimised conduction system pacing in symptomatic first-degree AV block.
Echocardiographic markers may refine selection for AV-optimised pacing in first-degree AV block; leaves open confirmation of long-term benefit in prospective trials.
Aims Patients with first-degree atrioventricular (AV) block and mechanical AV dyssynchrony can present with heart failure (HF)-like symptoms. AV-optimised conduction system pacing (CSP) can improve haemodynamics and symptoms, but selection criteria remain uncertain. We aimed to identify electrocardiographic and echocardiographic predictors of an acute haemodynamic response to AV-optimised CSP in symptomatic first-degree AV block. Methods and Results Nineteen patients (mean age 60.5 ± 21.1 years; 37% female) with symptomatic first-degree AV block underwent baseline electrocardiography and echocardiography followed by AV-optimised conduction system pacing and repeat echocardiographic assessment. Electrocardiographic parameters (PR interval, P wave duration/PR interval ratio) and echocardiographic indices (E/A wave confluence, A-Q interval, and DFT/RR ratio) were tested for association with change in left ventricular stroke volume (LVSV). The mean PR interval was 395 ± 61 ms, the mean A-Q interval 155±65 ms, and the mean DFT/RR ratio 0.34 ± 0.1. E/A wave confluence was present in 15 patients (79%). AV-optimised pacing increased LVSV by 7.8 ± 3.9 ml, corresponding to an 11.8 ± 5.7 % relative increase (p < 0.01). Echocardiographic parameters were associated with LVSV response, including A-Q interval (r = 0.63, p = 0.004), DFT/RR ratio (r = -0.59, p = 0.008) and E/A wave confluence (r = 0.57, p = 0.01). Electrocardiographic parameters were not associated with LVSV change. Conclusions Echocardiographically assessed mechanical AV dyssynchrony, rather than electrocardiographic parameters, is associated with an acute haemodynamic response to pacing. Echocardiographic evaluation may help identify patients with prolonged PR interval who could benefit from AV-optimised CSP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mežnar et al. (2026) studied this question. AV-optimised conduction system pacing increased left ventricular stroke volume by 11.8%, with echocardiographic markers predicting response better than ECG parameters.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: