Combined experimental and computational methods investigate crack kinking in GFRP joints, suggesting improved designs.
This study developed a combined computational-experimental approach to investigate crack kinking in thick adhesively bonded Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) composite joints, focusing on the adhesive joints found at wind turbine blade trailing edges. Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) tests were performed on composite joints with a 10-mm thick epoxy adhesive, representative of trailing-edge joints. Finite Element (FE) models included cross-ply GFRP composites and an adhesive layer. Subsequently, both the composite/adhesive interfaces and voids were explicitly modelled, allowing separate and combined evaluations of their effects on crack kinking. A cohesive zone model was used to capture the fracture along the composite/adhesive interfaces, while a Drucker-Prager plasticity model combined with a ductile damage model was used for the adhesive. The numerical findings indicated that crack kinking in FE simulations with explicit interfaces was primarily governed by the lower fracture resistance of the composite/adhesive interface relative to that of the bulk adhesive. Voids with a total volume fraction of approximately 1% were modelled by randomly deleting cubic 1 mm C3D8R elements in the adhesive layer to reproduce the voids typically observed in thick adhesive joints. The predicted crack paths closely matched experimental results. Simulations with voids revealed that voids above or below the adhesive midplane caused crack deflection toward the nearest interface. In models combining both features, cracks were consistently redirected toward the composite/adhesive boundary near voids, reproducing experimental observations. These results provide new insights into trailing-edge adhesive joint failure and establish a foundation for better modelling and design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: