PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Maternal and Child Health Journal1 citationsOpen Access

Preconception Interventions in Women at High Risk of Developing Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review

CGCatherine V. GeorgeDBDominika BhatiaOROlivia Righton

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of preconception interventions in women at high risk of developing gestational diabetes.
  • Conducted a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
  • Included dietary, physical activity, nutritional supplementation, and pharmacological interventions
  • Searched databases like MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials
  • Narrative synthesis of results without meta-analysis
  • Assessed studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
  • Identified six RCTs with a total of 909 participants
  • No significant effects of preconception interventions on gestational diabetes development were reported
  • Five trials were underpowered to detect meaningful effects
  • Limited evidence was available, highlighting a significant research gap
  • Need for future adequately powered RCTs to improve preconception care guidelines.

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy-related complication. The modest benefits of interventions to prevent GDM in women with high risk during pregnancy has shifted the focus to the preconception period. However, research on the effectiveness of preconception interventions in women who are more likely to develop GDM is lacking. This review aimed to assess the effect of preconception interventions, including behavioural strategies, supplementation, and pharmacological treatments on reducing the incidence of GDM. MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were first searched in February 2023 and updated in December 2025 (PROSPERO CRD42020177976). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating dietary/physical activity (PA)/combined, nutritional supplementation or pharmacological intervention in the pre-pregnancy period in women at high risk of developing GDM conducted in any country and reported in English were included. The pre-pregnancy period was defined as the period before and/or between pregnancies. A narrative synthesis was conducted in line with the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis guidelines, and each study was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Six RCTs, equating to nine publications (n = 909 participants in total) were included. Two interventions were conducted during the pre-pregnancy period and discontinued upon conception, and the remaining four were delivered pre-pregnancy and continued throughout pregnancy. Five trials focused on modifying both dietary intake and PA and one trial modified diet only. No studies reported a significant effect of preconception behaviour change intervention on GDM development; however, five of the trials were underpowered to do so. Limited evidence fitted this review’s inclusion criteria, highlighting a considerable research gap. Future well designed, adequately powered RCTs of behaviour change and/or pharmacotherapy in women at higher risk for developing GDM are necessary to inform preconception care guidelines to improve the immediate and long-term health of women and their infants. The modest benefits of intervention to prevent GDM during pregnancy in women at higher risk has shifted focus to the preconception period, highlighting the need for early intervention to reduce pregnancy complications and long-term maternal and child health risks. Additionally, preconception health is suboptimal among women at increased risk of GDM, including those living with overweight or obesity or with a history of GDM. This review evaluated interventions to reduce GDM which were initiated in the preconception period and highlights a critical evidence gap. Only six RCTs were identified and while the findings suggest that preconception diet and physical activity intervention shows some benefits, impact on GDM prevention remains uncertain due to underpowered studies. This review highlights the urgent need for adequately powered RCTs that specifically target the preconception period in women likely to develop GDM. Research gaps on pharmacological interventions to address preconception obesity were also identified in this review.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

George et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994c4b873532290d0209bbhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-026-04236-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Association of ethnicity and socioeconomic status with health outcomes in women with gestational diabetes: Clinical practice research datalink cohort study2024 · 14 citations
  2. 2“Reassurance that you're doing okay, or guidance if you're not”: A qualitative descriptive study of pregnant first time mothers’ expectations and information needs about postnatal care in England2020 · 30 citations
  3. 3Myo-Inositol, Probiotics, and Micronutrient Supplementation From Preconception for Glycemia in Pregnancy: NiPPeR International Multicenter Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial2021 · 65 citations
  4. 4Before the beginning: nutrition and lifestyle in the preconception period and its importance for future health2018 · 1,237 citations
  5. 5Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline2020 · 4,348 citations