Key result
Lifestyle interventions compared to usual care probably reduce the risk of large-for-gestational age babies (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.50-0.71), though they may increase the risk of induction of labor.
Why the study?
Do various treatment interventions improve health outcomes for women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their babies?
Population
17,984 women with gestational diabetes mellitus, 16,305 babies, and 1441 children from 128 RCTs across 10…
Comparison
Various treatments for gestational diabetes… vs Usual care, control, or alternative therapies.
Design
Systematic_review
Authors
Loading...
Lifestyle interventions may reduce large-for-gestational-age infants in GDM; leaves open optimal components and comparative effectiveness of alternatives.
Systematic Review (n=17,984)
Do various treatment interventions improve health outcomes for women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their babies?
Relative Risk: 0.6 (95% CI 0.5–0.71)
Lifestyle changes are the only intervention showing possible health improvements (fewer large-for-gestational-age babies) for women with GDM, though they may increase labor inductions, and evidence for most other treatments remains insufficient.
Martis et al. (2018) conducted a systematic review in Gestational diabetes mellitus (n=17,984). Lifestyle interventions vs. Usual care was evaluated on Large-for-gestational age (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.71). Lifestyle interventions compared to usual care probably reduce the risk of large-for-gestational age babies (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.50-0.71), though they may increase the risk of induction of labor.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: