Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved power matching in heavy machinery under varying load conditions, indicating enhanced efficiency.
Crawler cranes suffer from power mismatch in their electro-mechanical–hydraulic main drive system under sudden load variations and multi-action coupling conditions, which results in low energy utilization efficiency. This study establishes an electro-hydraulic closed-loop transfer function model and proposes a synthetic deviation-driven proportional–integral–derivative power matching control strategy to regulate hydraulic pump displacement. Experiments on a 1250 t crawler crane show that the model is reliable, with the coefficient of determination R2 between simulation and experimental data exceeding 0.94. The strategy improves power matching by 27.33% for the engine–pump link and 18.9% for the full link in single-action conditions, and 12.67% and 8.7% in compound-action conditions. After control, the engine–pump power matching coefficient stabilizes around 1.04 and the full-link coefficient stabilizes within 1.05 to 1.21 under single-action conditions, while under compound-action conditions, the engine–pump coefficient stabilizes within 1.05 to 1.15 and the full-link coefficient stabilizes within 1.0 to 1.25. The control strategy suppresses power mismatch and optimizes system stability and energy efficiency, which provides a technical reference for the optimization of electro-mechanical–hydraulic drive systems in heavy machinery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: