Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines the influence of three Iranian intellectuals on attitudes toward Bahá'ís, suggesting a perpetuation of negative narratives.
This article examines the works of three iconic Iranian intellectuals of the 1960s—the Muslim thinker Jalál Ál-i-Aḥmad, the Islamist ideologue ‘Alí Sharí‘atí, and the Marxist theorist Iḥsán Ṭabarí—and argues that their shared underlying assumption is the claim that the Bahá’í religion has foreign roots and that its leaders maintain clandestine ties with foreign powers. By uncritically accepting the master narrative of Bahá’í espionage—shaped in large part by The Confessions of Dalgurúkí in the 1940s—these intellectuals, contrary to their role as agents of change and critics of authority, helped further consolidate and perpetuate this narrative. In doing so, and given their significant influence, they contributed to the distancing of their readers from their Bahá’í compatriots.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mina Yazdani (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: