Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Causal relation extraction systems identify complex relationships, suggesting improved understanding of data nuances.
Existing causal relation extraction (CRE) systems prioritize binary (cause, effect) tuples, discarding strength distinctions. We introduce C-BERT, a multi-task transformer that extracts fine-grained relations as (C, E, I) triples, where I E [-1, +1] encodes signed influence. Our key contribution is a factorized architecture decomposing influence into three linguistically motivated classification heads – role, polarity, and salience – coupled with a negation-aware annotation framework that distinguishes indicator-based, propositional, and object negation. On German biodiversity discourse (2,391 relations), the factorized model consistently outperforms unified classification across five random seeds (0.768 ± 0.009 vs. 0.744 ± 0.007 reconstructed accuracy). Decomposed error analysis shows that factorization reduces multi-head error cascades and concentrates failures in single, interpretable subtasks. We release both model variants, code, and a data subset of German parliamentary debates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patrick David Johnson (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: