This work determines the dielectric function and band structure of ScN, indicating the significance of many-body effects.
In this work, we determine the dielectric function of ScN in a spectral range from 0.9 to <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mn>6.4</a:mn> <a:mspace width="0.28em"/> <a:mi>eV</a:mi> </a:mrow> </a:math> by spectroscopic ellipsometry from nondegenerate doped, bulk-like samples. Several models are applied to the obtained dielectric functions yielding the main critical-point transition energies. These results are compared with state-of-the-art computations, where the band structure of ScN is calculated using Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof (HSE06) hybrid functionals and quasiparticle corrections in the <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:mrow> <c:msub> <c:mi>G</c:mi> <c:mn>0</c:mn> </c:msub> <c:msub> <c:mi>W</c:mi> <c:mn>0</c:mn> </c:msub> </c:mrow> </c:math> approach. Furthermore, the dielectric function of ScN is derived from the computed band structure by solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation to account for electron-hole-pair interactions. We find exceptional agreement between computed and experimentally determined dielectric functions, where discrete excitons are not observed experimentally. We extrapolate an intrinsic direct band gap of <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <d:mrow> <d:mo>(</d:mo> <d:mn>2.182</d:mn> <d:mo>±</d:mo> <d:mn>0.004</d:mn> <d:mo>)</d:mo> <d:mspace width="0.28em"/> <d:mi>eV</d:mi> </d:mrow> </d:math> and an intrinsic indirect band gap of <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <f:mrow> <f:mo>(</f:mo> <f:mn>1.08</f:mn> <f:mo>±</f:mo> <f:mn>0.02</f:mn> <f:mspace width="0.28em"/> <f:mi>eV</f:mi> </f:mrow> </f:math> ) by taking into account many-body effects, while higher energy critical-point transition energies of <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <h:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</h:mi> </h:math> -point transitions are averaged over all samples, yielding <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <j:mrow> <j:msub> <j:mi>E</j:mi> <j:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</j:mi> </j:msub> <j:mo>=</j:mo> <j:mrow> <j:mo>(</j:mo> <j:mn>3.853</j:mn> <j:mo>±</j:mo> <j:mn>0.006</j:mn> <j:mo>)</j:mo> </j:mrow> <j:mspace width="0.28em"/> <j:mi>eV</j:mi> </j:mrow> </j:math> and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>E</m:mi> <m:msup> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</m:mi> <m:mo>′</m:mo> </m:msup> </m:msub> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mn>5.21</m:mn> <m:mo>±</m:mo> <m:mn>0.02</m:mn> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mspace width="0.28em"/> <m:mi>eV</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:math> . Critical-point transitions in the computed band structure, although, deviate from the experimental ones due to the omission of electron-hole-interaction, where the deviation increases with increasing energy. The dielectric limit of the electronic system is determined as <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <p:mrow> <p:msub> <p:mi>ɛ</p:mi> <p:mi>∞</p:mi> </p:msub> <p:mo>=</p:mo> <p:mn>8.38</p:mn> <p:mo>±</p:mo> <p:mn>0.04</p:mn> </p:mrow> </p:math> from experiment, where the computed dielectric function reveals almost the same value ( <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <q:mrow> <q:msub> <q:mi>ɛ</q:mi> <q:mi>∞</q:mi> </q:msub> <q:mo>=</q:mo> <q:mn>8.33</q:mn> </q:mrow> </q:math> ). Along with other previous publications, we conclude that solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation is indispensable for the computation of the dielectric function of semiconductors even in the absence of discrete excitons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grümbel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: